top of page
Search

Key Considerations for Robust IVRT Methods

Writer: Zoya BelosorochkoZoya Belosorochko

In Vitro Release Testing (IVRT) is a product performance test used to assess the drug release rate from topical and transdermal semisolid dosage forms. IVRT has become an essential tool for evaluating the performance of topical and semisolid pharmaceutical products. It plays a critical role in demonstrating batch-to-batch consistency, assessing formulation changes, and supporting bioequivalence (BE) in regulatory submissions. However, regulatory agencies, including the FDA and EMA, have increasingly identified deficiencies in IVRT study submissions, leading to delays and major objections in ANDA reviews. This article overviews the best practices for submitting IVRT test results that are compliant with the expectations of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.


Develop and Validate a Robust IVRT Method


Regulatory expectations are clearly outlined in USP <1724> Semisolid Drug Products – Performance Tests, which provides key guidance on IVRT testing requirements for topical products. Critical factors to address include:


IVRT Method Development: 


  • Temperature control (e.g., 32 ± 1°C for topical products).

  • Stirring rate consistency (e.g., 400-600 rpm is common for Vertical Diffusion Cells).

  • Receptor Solution composition ensures sink conditions.

  • Proper membrane selection to avoid API binding.

  • Dose Depletion (NMT 30%).

  • Sufficient sample application to maintain linear (steady state) release kinetics during the whole test duration.


IVRT Method Validation:


  • Linearity of release rate (r² ≥ 0.97).

  • Precision and reproducibility (RSD ≤ 15%).

  • Discrimination Sensitivity, Specificity, and Selectivity.

  • Membrane inertness and binding assessment.

  • Suitability of Receptor Solution.

  • Dose Depletion (NMT 30%).

  • Robustness to small changes in test conditions​ (e.g., changes in temperature, Receptor Solution composition, dose).


Analytical Method Validation (as per USP <621> Chromatography): 


  • Specificity (absence of interference).

  • Linearity and Working Range.

  • Recovery.

  • Method precision and accuracy.

  • Solutions Stability.

  • Robustness (e.g., mobile phase composition, mobile phase pH, column temperature).


A woman working in the lab

Demonstrate Discriminatory Ability


Regulations expect an IVRT method to be capable of detecting changes in the formulation or manufacturing process that could affect drug release. This is often referred to as method sensitivity, specificity, and selectivity or discriminatory capability. Essentially, the method should confirm that it can distinguish differences if, for example, the concentration of the drug is altered (50% or 150% strength products) or the amount/grades of excipients are changed.


How to demonstrate Sensitivity, Specificity, and Selectivity:


  • Include testing of formulations with small, intentional variations (e.g., different API strengths for the US market or slight changes in key excipients for the EU market) during method validation.

  • Method sensitivity demonstrates that the IVRT method consistently identifies higher or lower release rates of formulations with increased or decreased drug concentrations, respectively.

  • Method specificity demonstrates the IVRT method's ability to precisely detect and assess proportional changes in the release rate based on variations in drug concentration within the formulation.

  • Method selectivity demonstrates the IVRT method's ability to discriminate drug release rates between reference products and altered drug formulations.


Provide Comprehensive Documentation


A common reason for regulatory rejections is insufficient documentation. Each phase of the IVRT study should have a separate, detailed report:


  • Method Development Report.

  • IVRT Method Validation Protocol and Report.

  • Analytical Method Validation Protocol and Report.

  • Pivotal IVRT Study Report (IVRT Comparative Study Report)​.


Submission of successful IVRT reports requires close attention to data completeness, method processes, and regulatory expectations. By following best practices manufacturers can smooth the approval process. But beyond speeding the time to market, a well-documented submission is critical to reinforce confidence in the bioequivalency of the drug that is up for approval.

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All

Comments


bottom of page